JTDS VS MICROSOFT DRIVER DOWNLOAD

For artifacts I've dealt with before it is semi-automated; it infers the groupid-artifactid-version from the name of the file downloaded from the vendor site. Without it, running Google search software on your hardware would get you nothing. What a steaming pile, not to mention having to navigate the labyrinth of the IBM download site to even find it in the first place. Post Your Answer Discard By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy , and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. I have been using the jTDS driver in a production environment without any issues for 5 years. And they've open sourced a lot more than just.

Uploader:	Yokazahn
Date Added:	10 January 2014
File Size:	35.51 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	64881
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

JDBC4 was introduced with Java 6.

Hello, Thanks for taking the time to evaluate the performance of the Microsoft Driver. I might be way off, but there appears to be some low hanging fruit here. I would have figured microsoft would have used a linter to fix style issues with their code before Open Jtdds. Did you see Google open-sourcing their search engine? See an example here, on GitHub.

Examining the call stacks there are a number of things that look suspicious: Akonkagva on Nov 18, Here is qoute from https: But mifrosoft not so easy for a driver. Related content No related content found.

jTDS JDBC Driver

Make an internal maven plugin with what you need and add it to the company repo. The exact values to use in the new URL mcirosoft beyond the scope of this documentation; they must be chosen based on the jTDS settings they are replacing. Microsoft seems to be open-sourcing a fair bit of stuff lately. Microsoft is a tech company just like many others. It seems to be a problem with 8 space tabs in the browser, no? The existing configuration should look similar to this:.

Replace the jTDS driver with Microsoft JDBC driver

Thursday, July 9, 9: They gave out such horrible and dog slow drivers to their paying customers that people reverse engineered the protocol and wrote their own. If any of the MS engineers are reading this, I'd be happy to provide further details of the above observations and work together on solutions.

Jul 12 '17 at I have been using the jTDS driver in a production environment without any issues for 5 years. In my case, I'm only using Oracle from a Java web app, so I just put the driver directly into the JBoss JEE server brand of the day container setup, rather than something else in the Maven build.

Bitbucket Support

There are parts that make you say ouch. I have "lib" directory in the project and I have those jar files there. SloopJon on Nov 18, How did people use this before if it wasn't in the Maven Central Repo?

What are the differences between each driver? This site uses cookies for analytics, personalized content and ads.

Microsoft's driver is actively maintained, where jTDS hasn't been updated since and prior to the small round of updates done in it hadn't been updated for multiple years. Just curious that Microsoft doesn't force a linter on devs. As if the fact that jTDS is mostly unmaintained wasn't enough reason not to use it, the MS driver supports several extra useful features e. The value of Google software is not in the software itself, but also in the data.

And it still performs very well. It looks like the Prepared Statements are not being cached and reused.